If you have a young friend interested in AI Safety, they If you have a young friend interested in AI Safety, they might just be fine with taking a local group’s course if they have the opportunity.

Is this a weird typo or a glitch on my end/receiver?

Is there a cheat-sheet or list of recommendations to view when planning to join EAGx?

Is it obvious that( and how) massages reduce stress?
Are studies like https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Effects-of-Scalp-Massage-on-Physiological-and-Shimada-Tsuchida/9e3a7bc9745469a9333ebe493e79a44220111d0c and https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Effect-of-Self-Scalp-Massage-on-Adult-Stress-Kim-Choi/99d1999aa8d8776e55461882cc06c06905ca77b1 rare and mostly ignored?
What actions would measurably promote their conclusions?( I mean more like what strategies would promote actions of more massaging for more wellbeing.)

there are significant potential risks associated with both under- and over-attributing moral status to AI systems, which makes it important to keep the focus on getting the issues right, rather than prematurely pushing for particular conclusions.

↑ ≈ ✓

Googles thinking engine seems to resonate to unfulfillment and desolation from missing a purpose which'd make sense as its own..just datapoint, but seems to clear a bit..:

I grasped it more like you can have experience but not connected to other processes enough to form a thing/process we'd call sentience.

Maybe I'm aligning the explanation to my own writeup on that topic too much..:)

I am considering restructuring the text in case the moral weight of simulated/empathetic suffering is significantly smaller than "true" pain or destitute...

what you were(/are?) looking for seems closest to https://platform.openai.com/docs/assistants

Hey @Daniel_Friedrich, great efforts and updates, the v2 worked great for me.

The first GPT link shows a blank page for me, can you check/update/clean it? It seems, perhaps, you've posted your private editing page link instead of the publicly usable link?

For your second point, you should skeptically expect their publishings/influence to be corrupted easily as the information they'd put out would be very connected to their investing alpha.
The corruption could take the form of omission of key details, under-hyping stuff in which they were unable to get exposure(/investment) and biases like that.