D

DavidNash

Co-Director @ Effective Altruism UK
4735 karmaJoined Working (6-15 years)

Bio

How others can help me

I'm happy talking to anyone, don't hesitate to reach out. Specific things we may want to chat about include;

  • How fast/slow and where should EA grow as a movement?
  • What lessons can we learn from other movements?
  • How much should we focus on people in the core of EA vs on the fringe?
  • Do you have a new idea for a cause or project related to EA?

Topics I have been thinking about for a while but still enjoy chatting about:-

  • Movement building & strategy
  • Meta EA
  • Networks vs connections
  • New cause areas/interventions

How I can help others

If you're thinking about being a community organiser or are currently organising an EA related group then I'd be happy to share ideas on strategy and community building. Especially for people working on cause specific work or in neglected regions of the world.

I've been an organiser with EA UK since 2015, working part time since 2017 and full time since 2019. I've also had conversations with people setting up groups around the world and also career, cause, interest and workplace related groups.

I have also had quite a few career conversations with people and could be a good sounding board if you had career/project questions.

Comments
312

Topic contributions
1

I think EA and Nazism are quite different (in many ways). EA doesn't have a membership policy, and EA has a very wide range of philosophies, including opposing views, that people can believe in whilst still doing EA related work (positive vs negative utilitarianism, virtue ethics, deontology, consequentialism, some people care about animals some don't, a very large range of time discounts, etc).

As in the original article about EA as a question, it makes less sense philosophically and practically to have EA as an identity.

Maybe what you're noticing is people who haven't been asked about their 'EA' status before, giving the answer they would have always given.

Part of it may be that before FTX there was already a strong norm for people to not identify as EA (EA as a question). And that has only got stronger since. At least in the UK a lot of people working in EA areas wouldn't call themselves EA including myself, pre 2020.

There has been quite a bit written about democracy, I'm not sure if it fits your description but some of those posts might be related.

Effektiv Spenden also has a 'Defending Democracy' fund.

There's a write up here (if you mean the same thing), but it was about 30 people.

Quite a few development and EA adjacent organisations think AI will be quite important, if not the most important factor for future development. It is already being used by many companies, charities and governments around the world.

Another thing to look at would be how donations in general changed in 2020-2024. From what I've read, there have been decreases in US giving (of around 2%).

Thanks for this, do you know what process AMF uses to verify the number of people in a house? And if there are any incentives to under/over report.

I have heard anecdotally that there is the opposite problem in Uganda and Burkina Faso. 
 

In Burkina Faso the issue was that GDP per capita numbers were calculated from industrial output divided by population estimates so in order to look good, local government had an incentive to underestimate population so they seemed richer.

I'm not sure having a "bigger EA tent" leads to more funding/interest, if anything, people may be less likely to fund/support/be interested in a group that supports many different areas rather than the cause they mainly care about. At least it seems like cause specific orgs get much more funding than multi-cause/EA orgs.

Load more